Reason why Kobe Bryant has not been named the greatest basketball player of all time

 

The young version of Kobe (2000-2002) was the best because he was a bit of a team player, a more reliable passer, a more dependable defender, and sometimes deferred to Shaq. This Kobe, especially the one from 2001, was his greatest self. He was the best of both worlds, offensively and defensively. At 22, he has already won three championships as the second-best player in his squad. If he had remained to be that version, he would have won over Five rings in his career.

>> Best betting sites (2024)

What took place after that? He had a problem with his ego. In 2003–2004, he made the decision that he preferred to be the man to Shaq. He bemoaned Shaq’s alleged lack of effort. He was resentful that Shaq was considered the major guy and wanted to dominate the attention for himself. After he had done it, the team’s revenue decreased. 2003 playoff loss, 2004 championship loss (primarily due to Kobe trying to play hero ball).

 

Kobe decided to expel Shaq and Phil Jackson from Los Angeles because he wanted to take the lead.

 

The following three years, from 2005 to 2007, were the lowest point of his career since he was forced to play with inferior players after chasing the best player out of town. Phil Jackson returned in 2006 but needed help changing Kobe’s playing style. Kobe would frequently try to go 1v1 iso against a defender, break him down, and score showy. His style of play is characterized by an unrestrained “I don’t give Fuck how many guys are in my way” attitude. The commentators strongly dislike Kobe’s style of play since it not only slows down the game and leaves everyone standing about watching Kobe, but it is also an inefficient way to play basketball.

 

The Lakers’ response was to encircle him with a group of skilled rebounders. Lamar Odom was a premier Swiss army knife who was great at scoring, rebounding, and passing, but his consistency was a weakness. But, in 2008, they cheated the Grizzlies by delivering them Kwame Brown in exchange for Pau Gasol. Of course, Gasol was the crucial component. A Hall of Fame caliber player who can score, grab rebounds, and soar high is present here. The only difference is that they ALSO had Odom in addition to Gasol! Gasol was a bigger, more coherent version of Odom. Odom’s issue with consistency is resolved by benching him.

 

The successful formula for Kobe is completed by including other big men like Trevor Ariza/Ron Artest, Andrew Bynum, Derek Fisher, a non-dominant PG, and the Phil Jackson triangle offense, which forces Kobe to pass the ball and helps with defense and ball-bounce.

 

Kobe had to work hard to earn his final two rings. Specifically, a squad with three to four strong rebounders surrounding Phil Jackson. Add to those opponents from the 2009 Magic and the 2010 Celtics following KG’s injury, two relatively poor Finals opponents. Because of this, when people remark, “But look at her rings! It would help if you comprehended the context. He was an excellent team player for his first three championships (having Shaq apex also helps). Still, for his final two titles, he required everything to go according to plan with the ideal teammates all around him.

 

The league’s competition grew more intense after 2010. That’s it, indeed—all of those Kobe supporters constantly claiming that he defeated all 50+ championship teams. But none of those teams were title challengers. The only team that might have been comparable to the Kobe Lakers was the Nash/Stoudemire Suns, but the other 50 champions were essentially teams who weren’t endgame contenders. Yet, after 2010, we had the Big 3, OKC, the Lakers-sweeping Mavs, and teams from the Warriors, Spurs, Rockets, and Clippers that were all significantly better than any of the 50 winning teams Kobe defeated from 2008 to 2010.

 

In the 2010 Finals, who defeated the Kobe Lakers as well? The Celtics of 2010. that they only just defeated seven games. In 2011, LeBron’s Heat defeated this identical club in 5 games. So clearly, the Kobe Lakers couldn’t have beaten Lebron’s “super team.” Hence, it is evident that even with this particular squad constructed around him, it is not sustainable as a dynasty in the same manner that the Spurs or Warriors could do with Duncan and Curry at their center of success.

 

I need a more adaptable guy capable of winning with different systems and a range of other players around him for him to be regarded as the unquestioned best basketball player of all time. Because of Kobe’s rigid and contradictory playing style, assembling a successful squad around him is considerably more challenging.

 

Despite what many Kobe fanatics believe, he couldn’t have won with CP3. They would have dealt Gasol and Odom for him, which would have cost Kobe his best two rebounds for a player who stands 6 feet tall, and he has never been shown to succeed with perimeter players. Don’t reveal anything about Devin Booker either because he is a better shooter than Kobe, and teams were injured that season, allowing the Suns a chance to get to the Finals. Will Kobe and CP3 defeat Lebron’s OKC Big 3 and Heaters? Go now. Their size, which was their primary asset, needed to be recovered.

 

According to my analysis, he’s unproductive, needs more trophies to be called his team’s best player, only has one MVP award, and has never been regarded as the league’s top defender. And then there’s that.

 

Reason why Kobe Bryant has not been named the greatest basketball player of all time

 

The young version of Kobe (2000-2002) was the best because he was a bit of a team player, a more reliable passer, a more dependable defender, and sometimes deferred to Shaq. This Kobe, especially the one from 2001, was his greatest self. He was the best of both worlds, offensively and defensively. At 22, he has already won three championships as the second-best player in his squad. If he had remained to be that version, he would have won over Five rings in his career.

>> Best betting sites in Iceland (2024)

What took place after that? He had a problem with his ego. In 2003–2004, he made the decision that he preferred to be the man to Shaq. He bemoaned Shaq’s alleged lack of effort. He was resentful that Shaq was considered the major guy and wanted to dominate the attention for himself. After he had done it, the team’s revenue decreased. 2003 playoff loss, 2004 championship loss (primarily due to Kobe trying to play hero ball).

 

Kobe decided to expel Shaq and Phil Jackson from Los Angeles because he wanted to take the lead.

 

The following three years, from 2005 to 2007, were the lowest point of his career since he was forced to play with inferior players after chasing the best player out of town. Phil Jackson returned in 2006 but needed help changing Kobe’s playing style. Kobe would frequently try to go 1v1 iso against a defender, break him down, and score showy. His style of play is characterized by an unrestrained “I don’t give Fuck how many guys are in my way” attitude. The commentators strongly dislike Kobe’s style of play since it not only slows down the game and leaves everyone standing about watching Kobe, but it is also an inefficient way to play basketball.

 

The Lakers’ response was to encircle him with a group of skilled rebounders. Lamar Odom was a premier Swiss army knife who was great at scoring, rebounding, and passing, but his consistency was a weakness. But, in 2008, they cheated the Grizzlies by delivering them Kwame Brown in exchange for Pau Gasol. Of course, Gasol was the crucial component. A Hall of Fame caliber player who can score, grab rebounds, and soar high is present here. The only difference is that they ALSO had Odom in addition to Gasol! Gasol was a bigger, more coherent version of Odom. Odom’s issue with consistency is resolved by benching him.

 

The successful formula for Kobe is completed by including other big men like Trevor Ariza/Ron Artest, Andrew Bynum, Derek Fisher, a non-dominant PG, and the Phil Jackson triangle offense, which forces Kobe to pass the ball and helps with defense and ball-bounce.

 

Kobe had to work hard to earn his final two rings. Specifically, a squad with three to four strong rebounders surrounding Phil Jackson. Add to those opponents from the 2009 Magic and the 2010 Celtics following KG’s injury, two relatively poor Finals opponents. Because of this, when people remark, “But look at her rings! It would help if you comprehended the context. He was an excellent team player for his first three championships (having Shaq apex also helps). Still, for his final two titles, he required everything to go according to plan with the ideal teammates all around him.

 

The league’s competition grew more intense after 2010. That’s it, indeed—all of those Kobe supporters constantly claiming that he defeated all 50+ championship teams. But none of those teams were title challengers. The only team that might have been comparable to the Kobe Lakers was the Nash/Stoudemire Suns, but the other 50 champions were essentially teams who weren’t endgame contenders. Yet, after 2010, we had the Big 3, OKC, the Lakers-sweeping Mavs, and teams from the Warriors, Spurs, Rockets, and Clippers that were all significantly better than any of the 50 winning teams Kobe defeated from 2008 to 2010.

 

In the 2010 Finals, who defeated the Kobe Lakers as well? The Celtics of 2010. that they only just defeated seven games. In 2011, LeBron’s Heat defeated this identical club in 5 games. So clearly, the Kobe Lakers couldn’t have beaten Lebron’s “super team.” Hence, it is evident that even with this particular squad constructed around him, it is not sustainable as a dynasty in the same manner that the Spurs or Warriors could do with Duncan and Curry at their center of success.

 

I need a more adaptable guy capable of winning with different systems and a range of other players around him for him to be regarded as the unquestioned best basketball player of all time. Because of Kobe’s rigid and contradictory playing style, assembling a successful squad around him is considerably more challenging.

 

Despite what many Kobe fanatics believe, he couldn’t have won with CP3. They would have dealt Gasol and Odom for him, which would have cost Kobe his best two rebounds for a player who stands 6 feet tall, and he has never been shown to succeed with perimeter players. Don’t reveal anything about Devin Booker either because he is a better shooter than Kobe, and teams were injured that season, allowing the Suns a chance to get to the Finals. Will Kobe and CP3 defeat Lebron’s OKC Big 3 and Heaters? Go now. Their size, which was their primary asset, needed to be recovered.

 

According to my analysis, he’s unproductive, needs more trophies to be called his team’s best player, only has one MVP award, and has never been regarded as the league’s top defender. And then there’s that.